Critical Thoughts

The other side of the divide are shaking in their boots and are vehemently defending an individual whom they claim has no direct connection to or knew MHSAW personally. This makes me very suspicious. Would a criminal go to all lengths defending a stranger who has no connection to him / her for a crime committed by the criminal himself / herself? To what purpose does it serve? Also, considering how MHSAW and Arlene Tan had been commenting on the same thread (and in a different thread, Arlene Tan clearly admits feeling “trapped” by Islam, which puts paid to the claim that she is a practicing Muslim) casts doubt on any of the claims of these jokers.

At this juncture, and with the impeding body of evidence promised by GaySec in Part 3 of their OpsRamadhan agenda, I can only say two things:

1. That Arlene Tan and MHSAW are one and the same person, or;
2. Arlene Tan knows the identity of MHSAW and can lead the police to the “real” MHSAW.

I am leaning more towards Point 1, but hey, I can change my mind anytime. But I won’t accept any “evidence” (read: meaningless press releases) from these atheist jokers as “proof”.

Incoming search terms:

• #opsRamadhan